Fix the old accumulative process() function

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
   plugin could cause a crash. In practice this was only reproducible during the
   plugin scanning process when rapidly adding and removing a large number of
   plugins in a single group.
+- Fixed the implementation of the accumulative `process()` function. As far as
+  I'm aware no VST hosts made in the last few decades event use this, but it
+  just feels wrong to have an incorrect implementation as part of yabridge.
 
 ## [1.7.1] - 2020-10-23
 

src/plugin/plugin-bridge.cpp

@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
 
 #include "plugin-bridge.h"
 
+#include <execution>
+
 // Generated inside of the build directory
 #include <src/common/config/config.h>
 #include <src/common/config/version.h>
@@ -490,7 +492,7 @@ intptr_t PluginBridge::dispatch(AEffect* /*plugin*/,
         data, option);
 }
 
-template <typename T>
+template <typename T, bool replacing>
 void PluginBridge::do_process(T** inputs, T** outputs, int sample_frames) {
     // The inputs and outputs arrays should be `[num_inputs][sample_frames]` and
     // `[num_outputs][sample_frames]` floats large respectfully.
@@ -513,8 +515,23 @@ void PluginBridge::do_process(T** inputs, T** outputs, int sample_frames) {
 
     assert(response_buffers.size() == static_cast<size_t>(plugin.numOutputs));
     for (int channel = 0; channel < plugin.numOutputs; channel++) {
-        std::copy(response_buffers[channel].begin(),
+        if constexpr (replacing) {
-                  response_buffers[channel].end(), outputs[channel]);
+            std::copy(response_buffers[channel].begin(),
+                      response_buffers[channel].end(), outputs[channel]);
+        } else {
+            // The old `process()` function expects the plugin to add its output
+            // to the accumulated values in `outputs`. Since no host is ever
+            // going to call this anyways we won't even bother with a separate
+            // implementation and we'll just add `processReplacing()` results to
+            // `outputs`.
+            std::transform(std::execution::unseq,
+                           response_buffers[channel].begin(),
+                           response_buffers[channel].end(), outputs[channel],
+                           outputs[channel],
+                           [](const T& new_value, T& current_value) -> T {
+                               return new_value + current_value;
+                           });
+        }
     }
 
     // Plugins are allowed to send MIDI events during processing using a host
@@ -532,18 +549,25 @@ void PluginBridge::do_process(T** inputs, T** outputs, int sample_frames) {
     incoming_midi_events.clear();
 }
 
+void PluginBridge::process(AEffect* /*plugin*/,
+                           float** inputs,
+                           float** outputs,
+                           int sample_frames) {
+    do_process<float, false>(inputs, outputs, sample_frames);
+}
+
 void PluginBridge::process_replacing(AEffect* /*plugin*/,
                                      float** inputs,
                                      float** outputs,
                                      int sample_frames) {
-    do_process<float>(inputs, outputs, sample_frames);
+    do_process<float, true>(inputs, outputs, sample_frames);
 }
 
 void PluginBridge::process_double_replacing(AEffect* /*plugin*/,
                                             double** inputs,
                                             double** outputs,
                                             int sample_frames) {
-    do_process<double>(inputs, outputs, sample_frames);
+    do_process<double, true>(inputs, outputs, sample_frames);
 }
 
 float PluginBridge::get_parameter(AEffect* /*plugin*/, int index) {
@@ -697,12 +721,8 @@ void process_proxy(AEffect* plugin,
                    float** inputs,
                    float** outputs,
                    int sample_frames) {
-    // FIXME: This is incorrect, and I only noticed just now. I'm 99% sure no
+    return get_bridge_instance(*plugin).process(plugin, inputs, outputs,
-    //        hosts actually use this, but this will overwrite the buffer. On
+                                                sample_frames);
-    //        the plugin side we do properly handle plugins that only support
-    //        the old cumulative process function.
-    return get_bridge_instance(*plugin).process_replacing(
-        plugin, inputs, outputs, sample_frames);
 }
 
 void process_replacing_proxy(AEffect* plugin,

src/plugin/plugin-bridge.h

@@ -60,6 +60,18 @@ class PluginBridge {
                       intptr_t value,
                       void* data,
                       float option);
+    /**
+     * This is the old, accumulative version of `processReplacing()`. As far as
+     * I'm aware no host from the last 20 years will use this (since it's not
+     * very practical), but we have to support this anyways. Because this is not
+     * used, we'll just reuse your `process_replacing()` implementation (which
+     * actually falls back to `process()` if the plugin somehow does not support
+     * the former).
+     */
+    void process(AEffect* plugin,
+                 float** inputs,
+                 float** outputs,
+                 int sample_frames);
     /**
      * Ask the VST plugin to process audio for us. If the plugin somehow does
      * not support `processReplacing()` and only supports the old `process()`
@@ -90,11 +102,16 @@ class PluginBridge {
      * @tparam T The sample type. Should be either `float` for single preceision
      *   audio processing called through `processReplacing`, or `double` for
      *   double precision audio through `processDoubleReplacing`.
+     * @tparam replacing Whether or not `outputs` should be replaced by the new
+     *   processed audio. This is the normal behaviour for `processReplacing()`.
+     *   If this is set to `false` then the results are added to the existing
+     *   values in `outputs`. No host will use this last behaviour anymore, but
+     *   it's part of the VST2.4 spec so we have to support it.
      *
      * @see PluginBridge::process_replacing
      * @see PluginBridge::process_double_replacing
      */
-    template <typename T>
+    template <typename T, bool replacing>
     void do_process(T** inputs, T** outputs, int sample_frames);
 
     /**