Rework Wireguard performance section

FAQ/Wireguard.md

@@ -17,27 +17,17 @@ Wireguard is often known as *so much faster* than OpenVPN. Let's find out!
     docker run -it --rm --network=container:gluetun alpine:3.14 /bin/sh -c "apk add speedtest-cli && speedtest-cli"
     ```
 
-- Two machines were tested:
+| Host OS | CPU | CPU arch | CPU cores | Protocol | Download Mbps | Upload Mbps | Wireguard download increase | Wireguard upload increase |
-    1. Docker Desktop on WSL2 on a Windows host
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-        - 24 threads cpu (amd 5900x)
+| Windows with Docker desktop on WSL2 | AMD 5900x | `amd64` | `12` | OpenVPN | `299.24` | `463.69` | | |
-        - Running on Docker desktop with wsl2 on a windows host
+| Windows with Docker desktop on WSL2 | AMD 5900x | `amd64` | `12` | Wireguard | `298.55` | `493.49` | -0.23% | +5% |
-    2. Linux host
+| Arch Linux | AMD 2600x | `amd64` | `6` | OpenVPN | `645.91` | `481.25` | | |
-        - 12 threads cpu (amd 2600x)
+| Arch Linux | AMD 2600x | `amd64` | `6` | Wireguard | `673.37` | `561.28` | +4.2% | +16.6% |
-        - Running on an Arch Linux host with recent kernel
-
-Here comes the disappointment bomb...
-
-| Machine | Protocol | Download | Upload | Download diff vs other protocol |
-| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| Windows host | OpenVPN | `299.24` | `463.69` | +0.23% |
-| Windows host | Wireguard | `298.55` | `493.49` | -0.23% |
-| Linux host | OpenVPN | `645.91` | `481.25` | -4% |
-| Linux host | Wireguard | `673.37` | `561.28` | +4.2% |
 
 Conclusions:
 
 - Docker desktop on Windows sucks network performance wise 😆
-- Wireguard is only up to 4.2% faster than OpenVPN.
+- Wireguard is only 4.2% faster than OpenVPN (comparing the 2 maximum bandwidths `645.91` and `673.37`)
 
 Further investigations: